<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>What will be considered the &quot;Power Division&quot; of the KLAA? </title>
        <link>http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/topic/4285/t/What-will-be-considered-the-Power-Division-of-the-KLAA-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ The Ottawa-Kent has the RED

The MAC has the RED

The MEGA has the RED

The CHSL has the Central


What will be considered the &quot;RED&quot; of the KLAA?
 ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:20:25 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:54:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What will be considered the "Power Division" of the KLAA?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/reply/22840/t/What-will-be-considered-the-Power-Division-of-the-KLAA-.html#reply-22840</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think the parity is very good in all divisions. It may take a few years to determine what the top division is, but I have a feeling there won&#39;t be one
consistently. A lot of the mediocre teams will get a boost from the studs that come through every so often.
<br>
<br>
South: You can count on Canton and Glenn to be playoff contenders every year. Wayne and Franklin have been so-so, Plymouth has been ok for a young school and
Churchill has been bad, aside from 04 and 07.
<br>
<br>
Central:... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (cmcball11)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/22840</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:51:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What will be considered the "Power Division" of the KLAA?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/reply/19893/t/What-will-be-considered-the-Power-Division-of-the-KLAA-.html#reply-19893</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I have to agree here, I think top to bottom Central is tougher than the North, you have to think Northville would easily have done what Mott did, and that
Salem probably would&#39;ve been close to that don&#39;t you?????
<br>
<br>
If you take those bottom six teams I tempted to list them this way.
<br>
<br>
1. Northville
<br>
2. Salem
<br>
3. Mott
<br>
4. WLN
<br>
5. Kettering
<br>
****SLE**** ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Qman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/19893</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:08:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What will be considered the "Power Division" of the KLAA?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/reply/19675/t/What-will-be-considered-the-Power-Division-of-the-KLAA-.html#reply-19675</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ That &quot;1&quot; in Salem&#39;s 1-17 came against none other than...WLN, of course. One of Northville&#39;s three wins the last two years came against...WLN.
Of course, one of Northern&#39;s three wins came against Salem, but they also beat Glenn a couple years ago. (Don&#39;t know if that speaks more about WLN or
Glenn.) Kettering and Mott being in the OAA Pink the last few years has bolstered their record. Saw the &quot;Captains&quot; on film last year and one word
came to mind: yikes.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ColonelKVC)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/19675</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:52:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What will be considered the "Power Division" of the KLAA?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/reply/19674/t/What-will-be-considered-the-Power-Division-of-the-KLAA-.html#reply-19674</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">ColonelKVC wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <strong class="quote-title">Searn wrote:</strong>
    <hr>
    Despite Novi and Stevenson ... I have a hard time seeing the Central as the top division. .... the Central probably has the weakest bottom 3 in the KLAA.
    (SLE, Salem and Northville)
  </blockquote>

  <p>Not so fast my friend...let&#39;s match them up with Mott, Kettering, and Walled Lake Northern. Much worse IMO.</p>That said, I... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Searn)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/19674</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 22:19:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What will be considered the "Power Division" of the KLAA?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/reply/19670/t/What-will-be-considered-the-Power-Division-of-the-KLAA-.html#reply-19670</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Searn wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Despite Novi and Stevenson ... I have a hard time seeing the Central as the top division. .... the Central probably has the weakest bottom 3 in the KLAA.
  (SLE, Salem and Northville)
</blockquote>

<p> Not so fast my friend...let&#39;s match them up with Mott, Kettering, and Walled Lake Northern.  Much worse IMO.</p>That said, I think the South will be
stronger than the Central from top to bottom, and the strongest in... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ColonelKVC)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/19670</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:21:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What will be considered the "Power Division" of the KLAA?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/reply/19656/t/What-will-be-considered-the-Power-Division-of-the-KLAA-.html#reply-19656</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Despite Novi and Stevenson ... I have a hard time seeing the Central as the top division. .... the Central probably has the weakest bottom 3 in the KLAA. (SLE,
Salem and Northville) ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Searn)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/19656</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:22:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What will be considered the "Power Division" of the KLAA?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/reply/19655/t/What-will-be-considered-the-Power-Division-of-the-KLAA-.html#reply-19655</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Qman wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Is that including SLE for the Central, you can&#39;t count them.
  <br>
  <br>
  I also like how the joke that is the North Division is getting exposed, the 6th place team in the south might very well be in the top 3 in that division.
</blockquote>

<p> </p>

<p>If <a title="Michigan-Football " target="_blank" href="http://michigan-football.com/s/2008/klaacent.htm">Michigan-Football</a> is correct, SLE is playing
Varsity... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Searn)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/19655</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What will be considered the "Power Division" of the KLAA?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/reply/19650/t/What-will-be-considered-the-Power-Division-of-the-KLAA-.html#reply-19650</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Is that including SLE for the Central, you can&#39;t count them.
<br>
<br>
I also like how the joke that is the North Division is getting exposed, the 6th place team in the south might very well be in the top 3 in that division. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Qman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/19650</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:31:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What will be considered the "Power Division" of the KLAA?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/reply/19532/t/What-will-be-considered-the-Power-Division-of-the-KLAA-.html#reply-19532</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Here is a good way to rate the divisions in my opinion.
<br>
<br>
Average playoff wins per team since we went to the current playoff system
<br>
<br style="text-decoration: underline; font-weight: bold;">
<span style="text-decoration: underline; font-weight: bold;">Without Howell-Parker Counted for the KLAA West</span>
<br>
KLAA South = 4.17
<br>
KLAA Central = 3.33
<br>
KLAA West = 2.2
<br>
KLAA North = 2.17
<br>
<br style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;">
<span... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (TheOutlander)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/19532</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:11:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What will be considered the "Power Division" of the KLAA?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/reply/19492/t/What-will-be-considered-the-Power-Division-of-the-KLAA-.html#reply-19492</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ if the WLAA had remained all the teams slated for the KLAA South very well could be playoff qualifiers next year ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (stunt43)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/19492</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:55:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What will be considered the "Power Division" of the KLAA?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/reply/19472/t/What-will-be-considered-the-Power-Division-of-the-KLAA-.html#reply-19472</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I voted for the South as well ... somewhat a tough call, but top to bottom gotta be the South going in...
<br>
<br>
As much as I enjoy seeing the &quot;RED&quot; divisions compete, the KLAA has a nice setup the saves some travel time and will put all the top KLAA teams in
the playoffs on a yearly basis.
<br>
<br>
I&#39;m sure the teams are happy with this setup for that reason. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Searn)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/19472</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:35:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What will be considered the "Power Division" of the KLAA?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/reply/19471/t/What-will-be-considered-the-Power-Division-of-the-KLAA-.html#reply-19471</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I would say right now you&#39;d have to go with the South, but the clearest thing to me is that, in the long run, there won&#39;t be a &quot;Red&quot; Division
in this league b/c it&#39;s arranged by geography. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ColonelKVC)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/sreply/19471</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:48:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ What will be considered the "Power Division" of the KLAA?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/topic/4285/t/What-will-be-considered-the-Power-Division-of-the-KLAA-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The Ottawa-Kent has the RED
<br>
The MAC has the RED
<br>
The MEGA has the RED
<br>
The CHSL has the Central
<br>
<br>
What will be considered the &quot;RED&quot; of the KLAA?
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (TheOutlander)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.michiganhsfootball.com/topic/4285</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:20:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>